物理失效模式结论

本章就故障失效模式分析做了初步解释，简要说明了不同应力和暴露在不同应力下缺陷之间的关系。全面运用故障失效模式分析能够提供恰当的加速转换模式【1】同时也帮助验证提高产品寿命不同方法。作者认为在如何选择设计没有经验经验的时候，失效故障模式分析无疑非常有益，但设计者有了这样一个基础知道如何设计，他也就不一定需要做失效故障模式分析了。HALT是找到产品最薄弱环节的强有力工具，很大程度上减轻或甚至不需要做失效故障模式分析。看起来最佳的方式是将HALT和PoF组合起来使用，在大部分领域，最有效的方法是工程师能够运用所有可能的工具和技术来帮助设计和制造。
参考文献：
1. Upadhyayla,K. and Dasguptak,A.,Guidelines for physics-of-failure based accelerated stress testing, Proceedings of the 1998 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium. This paper has many references of interest to PoF. These are all listed below for the convenience of the reader.
2. Miner, M. A., Cumulative damages in fatigue, Journal of Applied Mechanics, 12,(1945)
3. Steinberg, D., Vibration analysis for electronic equipment, John Wiley&Sons, New York(1988).
4. Smithson, S.A., Effectiveness and economics-Yardsticks for ESS decisions, 1990 Proceedings of the IES.
5. Hakim, E.B., Microelectronic reliability/temperature independence, Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 7, pp.215-220
6. Hobbs, G.K., Flaw stimulus relationships, Sound and Vibration, April 1986
7. Silverman, M. A., Summary of HALT and HASS results at an accelerated reliability test center, Proceedings of the 998 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium.